!--THE CONTENT OF THIS FILE WILL BE APPENDED TO EVERY PAGE INSIDE THE ELEMENT-->
Finley James

Transparency in Family Courts

Transparency in Family Courts: A New Era of Openness and Accountability

Starting from 27 January 2025, family courts across England and Wales will operate under newly expanded transparency rules. This landmark change grants journalists and legal bloggers greater access to report on family court cases, representing a significant step towards enhancing openness and accountability within a system often criticised for its secrecy. The phased implementation of these rules will initially focus on public law cases, such as care proceedings, before extending to private law cases, including those involving separating parents, and finally to magistrates' courts.



A Shift Towards Greater Openness

Historically, family courts in England and Wales have maintained a high degree of confidentiality, primarily to protect the welfare of children and families. While this approach aimed to safeguard vulnerable individuals, it has also drawn criticism for limiting public scrutiny and accountability. Critics have argued that excessive secrecy can obscure potential judicial errors and undermine public trust in the justice system.


Efforts to address these concerns date back to 2008, when the government proposed allowing media access to family court proceedings. Under these proposals, journalists were permitted to report on cases with specific restrictions designed to protect the anonymity of those involved. Justice Secretary Jack Straw, a key advocate of these changes, emphasised the importance of lifting the veil on legal processes to improve both accountability and public confidence.


The new transparency rules go further by empowering journalists to request transparency orders. These orders allow access to critical case details and documents, as well as the opportunity to speak with families involved, provided that their identities remain protected. This development aims to balance the need for public oversight with the privacy rights of those participating in court proceedings.



The Challenge of Balancing Transparency and Privacy

Despite these reforms, challenges persist. One notable example is the recent ban on naming judges involved in the care proceedings for Sara Sharif. Mr Justice Williams imposed this restriction to prevent the judges from becoming targets of public hostility and to ensure fair and balanced reporting. Media organisations have contested this decision, arguing that it undermines the principle of open justice and sets a concerning precedent for transparency.


This incident underscores the delicate balance that the justice system must maintain. On one hand, transparency is essential for promoting public trust, ensuring accountability, and preventing the perception of bias or injustice. On the other hand, the privacy and welfare of children and families remain paramount, necessitating safeguards to protect them from potential harm caused by public exposure.




The Road Ahead for Family Justice Reform

The recent reforms are part of a broader effort to modernise the family justice system and align it with evolving societal expectations. By gradually implementing transparency across different types of cases, the courts aim to learn from each phase and address any unforeseen challenges that arise. This iterative approach reflects the judiciary’s commitment to balancing openness with the protection of vulnerable individuals.


As the new transparency rules take effect, the legal community, media, and public will play crucial roles in shaping how these reforms are applied in practice. Constructive dialogue and responsible reporting will be essential to ensure that the benefits of transparency are realised without compromising the privacy and dignity of those involved in family court proceedings.


In this new era of openness, the family justice system has an opportunity to rebuild public trust by demonstrating its commitment to fairness, accountability, and the welfare of all parties. The journey ahead will not be without its challenges, but with careful implementation and oversight, it has the potential to transform the perception and effectiveness of family justice in England and Wales.



Our Commitment to Justice and Transparency

At Finley James, we fully recognise the significance of these developments in enhancing trust and integrity within the judicial system. Transparency is not merely an administrative reform; it is a cornerstone of justice that ensures the legal process is both accessible and comprehensible to those it serves. We believe that when justice is seen to be done, it fosters confidence in the rule of law and strengthens societal cohesion. By promoting openness, we can mitigate misunderstandings, prevent misinformation, and reassure the public that the system operates fairly and equitably. As advocates for justice and accountability, we are committed to supporting individuals and families navigating these complex processes, ensuring their voices are heard and their rights are safeguarded within this evolving legal landscape.



The Role of Judges in Family Cases
by Evie Towse 6 February 2025
District Judges are responsible for a wide range of civil and family law cases. Previously known as registrars, these judges hear cases related to divorces, child custody, domestic violence injunctions, possession proceedings, and more. They are appointed to circuits and can preside over cases in both County Courts and High Court district registries. Their jurisdiction is one of the most extensive among judicial appointments, allowing them to handle complex family and civil law disputes.
Does my child have a voice in court?
4 February 2025
Family courts consider children's views through professionals like Cafcass officers, ensuring their voices are heard in a safe and supportive manner. However, court decisions prioritise the child's long-term welfare, balancing their wishes with factors affecting their overall well-being.
Guidance on parental alienation
by James Anderson 12 December 2024
A child's rejection of a parent, on its own, is insufficient to confirm parental alienation. Instead, courts must evaluate whether this rejection is justified, possibly influenced by the parent’s behavior. (Read More)
by James Anderson 2 December 2024
Navigating the journey of co-parenting can be challenging, yet it is immensely rewarding when done right. At Finley James, we are excited to introduce our new Co-Parenting Coaching service, designed as an out-of-court remedy to support and enhance the co-parenting experience.
Grandparent Rights
by James Anderson 29 November 2024
If you're a grandparent facing access issues, know that you're not alone – support and guidance are available. Contact us through 01482 420501 or email us at info@finleyjames.online
Bereavement Act 2024
by James Anderson 22 November 2024
Important Update: New Changes in Paternity Leave
Understanding Family Law
by James Anderson 13 August 2024
Understanding the 2024 Family Law Reforms: What You Need to Know
Child Arangement Order, C100
by James Anderson 15 July 2024
Navigating Child Arrangements: A Simplified Guide
Role of McKenzie Friend
by James Anderson 1 May 2024
The Role of a McKenzie Friend: Your Companion in Navigating the Legal System
Family Court Fees
by James Anderson 23 April 2024
Changes Coming to Family Court Fees in 2024: What You Need to Know In the world of family law, even the fees can have an impact on individuals navigating the complexities of divorce, child arrangements, and financial settlements. As we approach May 1st, 2024, significant changes are on the horizon for Family Court fees in the UK, marking the first adjustment since 2021. 
More posts
Share by: